Wednesday, 14 January 2015

Journal Task


Reading Journal 2014

DEADLINE FOR READING JOURNAL: Wednesday Jan 14th

A contextual reading on Marxist and Feminist developments

Expansion of Feminism

1st Wave

First-wave feminism refers to a period of feminist activity during the 19th and early 20th century throughout the world, particularly in the United Kingdom and the United States which focused on legal issues, primarily on gaining women's suffrage (the right to vote).

Particular Works to note:

Mary Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792):

“Strengthen the female mind by enlarging it, and there will be an end to blind obedience.” which was a foundation stone for the modern feminism we still have today. In this she expressed passionate views for the fight to equal rights of women and against their 'domestic tyranny' that had left them impotent to fight against patriarchy. By this she meant that women were 'forced' to stay at home and be domestic as they were uneducated, had no political rights and were socially and materially dependant on men for everything. Wollstonecraft had very liberal thoughts which was very shocking in the Victorian era, as a woman was brought up to be patriarchal, so saying things such as “My own sex, I hope, will excuse me, if I treat them like rational creatures, instead of flattering their fascinating graces, and viewing them as if they were in a state of perpetual childhood, unable to stand alone.”

Lois Waisbrooker’s: A Sex Revolution (1893)

http://pagesofjulia.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/roomofonesown.jpghttps://c1.staticflickr.com/1/5/10726013_3f98e76a9f.jpghttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkdR-JqItSFbuGEfJ0eCeA6cQNMSvFEUUi9vM6xXC28dSb6NKioC-FNe442s3XyraGLAI9LD70HjXDIEM8K2EMhmCAyt3FpOVuzKj4n50ZngE9wvAjBBhk66JVRIuXlVVkMMDVrYjuNYN0/s1600/224387.jpgMarie Stopes: Married Love (1918)

The US Customs Service banned the book as obscene until April 6, 1931, when Judge John M. Woolsey overturned that decision. Woolsey is the same judge who in 1933 would lift the ban on James Joyce's Ulysses, allowing for its publication and circulation in the United States of America. It was the first book to note that women's sexual desire coincides with ovulation and the period right before menstruation. The book argued that marriage should be an equal relationship between partners. Although officially scorned in the UK, the book went through 19 editions and sales of almost 750,000 copies by 1931.

Virginia Woolf: A Room of One’s Own (1929)

  • “Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind.”
  • “A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction”

 

Woolf has touched off one of the most important assertions of feminist literary criticisms. The oft-held argument that women produce inferior works of literature must necessarily be qualified by the fact of the circumstances of women. Unlike their male counterparts, they are routinely denied the time and the space to produce creative works. Instead, they are saddled with household duties and are financially and legally bound to their husbands. By being deprived of rooms of their own, there is little possibility for women to rectify the situation. Even though this is clearly a historical truth, Woolf’s assertion was revolutionary at its time. It recast the accomplishments of women in a new and far more favorable light, and it also forced people to realize the harsh truths about their society.

History

In 1928, the franchise of voting after 1918   was extended to all women over 21 by the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928, on an equal basis to men.

What British Victorian feminists did accomplish in their work as writers, journalists, and public speakers was to create a culture where change and creative thinking were possible. Certainly, this is where the disconnect lies in media portrayals of feminists as glamorous figures whose public accomplishment resides in material wealth or as mysterious academics emotionally detached from the kinds of workplace and family issues which women from all socio-economic classes face. Incomplete images of feminist membership cloud the substance of feminist ideas. (2)

  • Politically the first feminist movement had its roots in the abolitionist movement of the 1830's. The issues of the abolitionists were the freedom of slaves and that issue was directly linked to the freedom of women.[1]
  • The first wave of feminism took place in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, emerging out of an environment of urban industrialism and liberal, socialist politics.
  • The goal of this wave was to open up opportunities for women, with a focus on suffrage.
  • Discussions about the vote and women's participation in politics led to an examination of the differences between men and women as they were then viewed. Some claimed that women were morally superior to men, and so their presence in the civic sphere would improve public behaviour and the political process.

Timeline of UK first-wave feminism

  • The Married Women’s Property Act was passed in 1870 expanded in 1874 and 1882, giving women control over their own earnings and property.
  • The United Kingdom extended the right to vote in local elections to married women.
  • The Women's Social and Political Union was founded.
  • On January 17, suffragettes chained themselves to the railings of 10 Downing Street. Emmeline Pankhurst was imprisoned for the first time.
  • In July, Marion Wallace Dunlop became the first imprisoned suffragette to go on a hunger strike. As a result, force-feeding was introduced.
  • November 18 was "Black Friday", when the suffragettes and police clashed violently outside Parliament after the failure of the first Conciliation Bill. Ellen Pitfield, one of the suffragettes, later died from her injuries.
  • The suffragette Emily Davison was killed by the King's horse at the Epsom Derby.
  • The Representation of the People Act was passed which allowed women over the age of 30 who met a property qualification to vote. Although 8.5 million women met this criteria, it only represented 40 per cent of the total population of women in the UK. The same act extended the vote to all men over the age of 21.
  • The Parliament (Qualification of Women) Act 1918 was passed allowing women to stand as Members of Parliament.
  • The Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 became law. In a broad opening statement it specified that, “[a] person shall not be disqualified by sex or marriage from the exercise of any public function, or from being appointed to or holding any civil or judicial office or post, or from entering or assuming or carrying on any civil profession or vocation”. The Act in practice fell far short of the expectations of the women’s movement. Senior positions in the civil service were still closed to women and they could be excluded from juries if evidence was likely to be too “sensitive”.
  • 1920: Nancy Astor became the first woman to take her seat in the House of Commons.
  • 1920: Oxford University opened its degrees to women.
  • The Law of Property Act 1922 was passed, giving wives the right to inherit property equally with their husbands.
  • The Matrimonial Causes Act gave women the right to petition for divorce on the grounds of adultery.
  • 1925: The Guardianship of Infants Act gave parents equal claims over their children
  • 1928: The right to vote was granted to all UK women equally with men in 1928.[2]

2nd Wave

(Carter’s work took place in this stage, both The Bloody Chamber (1979) and The Sadeian Woman and the Ideology of Pornography (1979).

The second wave began in the 1960s and continued into the 1990s. This wave unfolded in the context of the anti-Vietnam War and civil rights movements and the growing self-consciousness of a variety of minority groups around the world. The New Left was on the rise, and the voice of the second wave was increasingly radical. In this phase, sexuality and reproductive rights were dominant issues, and much of the movement's energy was focused on passing the Equal Rights Amendment to the American constitution guaranteeing social equality regardless of sex.

This phase began with protests against the Miss America pageant in Atlantic City in 1968 and 1969. Feminists parodied what they held to be a degrading "cattle parade" that reduced women to objects of beauty dominated by a patriarchy that sought to keep them in the home or in dull, low-paying jobs. The radical New York group called the Red stockings staged a counter pageant, in which they crowned a sheep as Miss America and threw "oppressive" feminine artefacts such as bras, girdles, high-heels, makeup and false eyelashes into the trashcan.

Because the second wave of feminism found voice amid so many other social movements, it was easily marginalized and viewed as less pressing than, for example, Black Power or the effort to end the war in Vietnam. Feminists reacted by forming women-only organizations (such as NOW- an interest group National Organisation of Women) and "consciousness raising" groups. In publications like "The BITCH Manifesto" and "Sisterhood is Powerful," feminists advocated for their place in the sun. The second wave was increasingly theoretical, based on a fusion of neo-Marxism and psycho-analytic theory and began to associate the subjugation of women with broader critiques of patriarchy, capitalism, normative heterosexuality, and the woman's role as wife and mother. Sex and gender were differentiated — the former being biological, and the later a social construct that varies culture-to-culture and over time.

Whereas the first wave of feminism was generally propelled by middle class white women, the second phase drew in women of colour and developing nations, seeking sisterhood and solidarity and claiming, "Women's struggle is class struggle." Feminists spoke of women as a social class and coined phrases such as "the personal is political" and "identity politics" in an effort to demonstrate that race, class and gender oppression are all related. They initiated a concentrated effort to rid society top-to-bottom of sexism, from children's cartoons to the highest levels of government.

One of the strains of this complex and diverse "wave" was the development of women-only spaces and the notion that women working together create a special dynamic that is not possible in mixed-groups and that would ultimately work for the betterment of the entire planet. Women, whether due to their long "subjugation" or to their biology, were thought by some to be more humane, collaborative, inclusive, peaceful, nurturing, democratic and holistic in their approach to problem-solving than men. The term eco-feminism was coined to capture the senses that, because of their biological connection to earth and lunar cycles, women were natural advocates of environmentalism.[3]

3rd Wave

The third phase of feminism began in the mid-1990s and is informed by post-colonial and post-modern thinking. In this phase many constructs have been destabilized, including the notions of "universal womanhood," body, gender, sexuality and hetreronormativity. An aspect of third wave feminism that mystifies the mothers of the earlier feminist movement is the re-adoption by young feminists of the very lipstick, high heels and cleavage proudly exposed by low cut necklines that the first two phases of the movement identified with male oppression. Pinkfloor expressed this new position when she said; "It's possible to have a push-up bra and a brain at the same time."

The "grrls" of the third wave have stepped onto the stage as strong and empowered, eschewing victimization and defining feminine beauty for themselves as subjects, not as objects of a sexist patriarchy. They have developed rhetoric of mimicry, which reappropriates derogatory terms like "slut" and "bitch" in order to subvert sexist culture and deprive it of verbal weapons. The web is an important aspect of the new "girlie feminism." E-zines have provided "cybergrrls" and "netgrrls" another kind of women-only space. At the same time — rife with the irony of third-wave feminism because cyberspace is disembodied — it permits all users the opportunity to cross gender boundaries and so the very notion of gender has been challenged.

This is in keeping with the third wave's celebration of ambiguity and refusal to think in terms of "us-them" or in some cases their refusal to identify themselves as "feminists" at all. Grrl-feminism tends to be global and multi-cultural, and it shuns simple answers or artificial categories of identity, gender and sexuality. Its transversal politics means that differences such as those of ethnicity, class, sexual orientation, etc., are celebrated but recognized as dynamic, situational and provisional. Reality is conceived not so much in terms of fixed structures and power relations, but in terms of performance within contingencies. Third wave feminism breaks boundaries.

Expansion of Marxism

Marxism 20th century

•Marxism is the movement founded by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels which fights for the self-emancipation of the working class, subjecting all forms of domination by the bourgeoisie.

•The political curriculum of Marxism in the 20th century began, after the “sheet lightning” of the Russian revolution in 1905

•The problem is rooted in the very centre of the Marxist cause, which concerns the position of working individuals within the relations of production. In Marx's terms: the State-socialist way to run the mode of production formed a structure of alienation, depriving the workers of their societal accomplishment.

•The task was to break the boundaries between ‘civil’ and ‘bourgeois’ society. Civil meant inclusive-participatory, bourgeois meant exclusive-private. (The difference in class was highly defined)

•A competitive struggle for jobs was created

•The Women’s Liberation Movement (1960’s) conducted its critique both of existing patriarchal society and the legacy of orthodox Marxism, and a number of significant leaders in the women's movement either abandoned Marxism or introduced Marxism into the concepts of women's liberation.

The 20th century was largely defined by the struggle between capitalism and communism. Communism is so influential because even capitalist countries like America were defined in the 20th century by their anti-Communist policies, and because communism was a critical factor in the development of the climate that led to World War II, as fascism itself developed in opposition to communism.[4]

Despite sharing similar premises, different schools of Marxism might reach contradictory conclusions from each other. For instance, different Marxian economists have contradictory explanations of economic crisis and different predictions for the outcome of such crises. Furthermore, different variants of Marxism apply Marxist analysis to study different aspects of society (e.g. mass culture, economic crises, or feminism).

These theoretical differences have led various socialist and communist parties and political movements to embrace different political strategies for attaining socialism and advocate different programs and policies from each other. One example of this is the division between revolutionary socialists and reformists that emerged in the German Social Democratic Party (SPD) during the early 20th century.

History

In 1959, the Cuban Revolution led to the victory of anti-imperialist Fidel Castro (1926–) and his July 26 Movement. Although the revolution had not been explicitly socialist, upon victory Castro ascended to the position of Prime Minister and eventually adopted the Leninist model of socialist development, forging an alliance with the Soviet Union. One of the leaders of the revolution, the Argentine Marxist revolutionary Che Guevara (1928–1967), subsequently went on to aid revolutionary socialist movements in Congo-Kinshasa and Bolivia, eventually being killed by the Bolivian government, possibly on the orders of the CIA, though the CIA agent sent to search for Guevara, Felix Rodriguez expressed a desire to keep him alive as a possible bargaining tool with the Cuban government; he would posthumously go on to become an internationally recognised icon.

In the People's Republic of China, the Maoist government undertook the Cultural Revolution from 1966 through to 1976 in order to purge capitalist elements from Chinese society and entrench socialism. However, upon Mao's death, his rivals seized political power and under the Premiership of Deng Xiaoping (1978–1992), many of Mao's Cultural Revolution era policies were revised or abandoned and much of the state sector privatised.

The late 1980s and early 1990s saw the collapse of most of those socialist states that had professed a Marxist–Leninist ideology. In the late 1970s and 1980s, the emergence of the New Right and neoliberal capitalism as the dominant ideological trends in western politics – championed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan and U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher – led the west to take a more aggressive stand against the Soviet Union and its Leninist allies. Meanwhile, in the Soviet Union, the reformist Mikhael Gorbachev (1931–) became Premier in March 1985, and began to move away from Leninist-based models of development towards social democracy. Ultimately, Gorbachev's reforms, coupled with rising levels of popular ethnic nationalism in the Soviet Union, led to the state's dissolution in late 1991 into a series of constituent nations, all of which abandoned Marxist–Leninist models for socialism, with most converting to capitalist economies.[5]

The success of Thatcher in attacking the working class movement in Britain encouraged middle class aspiring politicians in the East like Klaus and presaged a situation in which Hayekian economic doctrines would become the orthodoxy. Thatcher’s doctrine TINA, There Is No Alternative, (to capitalism) was generally accepted.[6]

Marxism 21st century

So today we are faced with a whole new set of questions. The general intellectual/ideological environment is much less favourable to socialism than it was in the 20th century. This is not merely a consequence of the counter-revolutions that occurred at the end of the 20th century, but stems from a new and more vigorous assertion of the classic tenets of bourgeois political economy. This re-assertion of bourgeois political economy not only transformed economic policy in the West, but also prepared the ideological ground for counter revolutions in the East

 

History

At the turn of the 21st century, China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam remained the only officially Marxist–Leninist states remaining, although a Maoist government led by Prachanda (1954–) was elected into power in Nepal in 2008 following a long guerrilla struggle. The early 21st century also saw the election of socialist and anti-imperialist governments in several Latin American nations, in what has come to be known as the "Pink tide". Dominated by the Venezuelan government of Hugo Chávez, this trend also saw the election of Evo Morales in Bolivia, Rafael Correa in Ecuador and Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua; forging political and economic alliances through international organisations like the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas, these socialist governments allied themselves with Marxist–Leninist Cuba, and although none of them espoused a Leninist path directly, most admitted to being significantly influenced by Marxist theory. For Italian Marxist Gianni Vattimo in his 2011 book Hermeneutic Communism "this new weak communism differs substantially from its previous Soviet (and current Chinese) realization, because the South American countries follow democratic electoral procedures and also manage to decentralize the state bureaucratic system through the misiones (social missions for community projects). In sum, if weakened communism is felt as a specter in the West, it is not only because of media distortions but also for the alternative it represents through the same democratic procedures that the West constantly professes to cherish but is hesitant to apply"

 

Carter pre ‘Bloody Chamber’ (The Sadeian Woman)

The Sadeian Woman Chapter One “Polemical Preface: Pornography in the service of women:

The Sadeian Woman, appeared alongside The Bloody Chamber in 1979. "I really can't see what's wrong with finding out about what the great male fantasies about women are," she declared, reasonably enough, when The Sadeian Woman came under attack. It is a difficult, provocative book whose Polemical Preface is subtitled "pornography in the service of women" - and a continuing bone of contention for contemporary readers.

One shining aperçu that emerges from its pages to spread light through the stories of The Bloody Chamber is that passivity is never a virtue, in fact, even - especially not - in women. "Justine marks the start of a kind of self-regarding female masochism, a woman with no place in the world, no status, the core of whose resistance has been eaten away by self-pity," wrote Carter, tracing the descendants of De Sade's heroine Justine down to Marilyn Monroe. Another passage might have been written specifically as an epigraph for The Bloody Chamber: To be the object of desire is to be defined in the passive case. To exist in the passive case is to die in the passive case - that is, to be killed. This is the moral of the fairy tale about the perfect woman.

Concurrently with writing these fairy tales, Angela Carter was making a translation of Perrault; she followed both books with her most contrary and uncompromising essay, The Sadeian Woman (1979), which forms a diptych with The Bloody Chamber. Carter once remarked, “For me, a narrative is an argument stated in fictional terms,” and her writing fulfils that unexpected definition. In this counterblast to the virtuous claims of feminism, Carter identifies the Marquis de Sade as an honest witness to the conditions of bourgeois marriage, the economics of sexual relations, and the collusion of women with their own enslavement and subjugation. While as a writer she clothes herself in sparkling ornament and sensuous fantasy, she continues to operate surgically, with Enlightenment fury against hypocrisy and modations. The Sadeian Woman makes a Swiftian “modest proposal” about pornography, and it provides a valuable gloss on themes in The Bloody Chamber:

The essay still has a starkly clarifying ethical force today, but it cost Angela Carter many friends and supporters, especially among US femnists, and marked her out as someone for whom nothing is sacred (echoed in the title of her 1982 selected essays), who never toed the party line, not even the party line of her natural allies. Like her friend JG Ballard, and her own Red Riding Hood, she was nobody’s meat.

Cognitive theorists of language have identified such travelling movements and embodied presences in narrative as prime conductors of readerly empathy, replicating the motions of thought itself as it models scenes and experiences in the mind’s eye. Carter’s mastery of these effects brings about a quality of hallucinatory reality, dream-like in its close-up intensity that wraps the products of her unleashed fantasy. She knew what wordpower could do: “No werewolf make-up in the world can equal the werewolf you see in your mind’s eye,” she wrote.

Quotes:

  • “the probe and the fringed hole…the simplest expression of stark and ineradicable sexual differentiation , a universal pictorial language of lust , or rather , a language we accept as universal because , since it has always been so , we conclude that it must always remain so”
  • From this elementary iconography may be derived the whole metaphysic of sexual differences – man aspires; woman has no other function but to exist waiting. The male is positive, an exclamation mark. Woman is negative. Between her legs lies nothing but zero, the sign for nothing that only becomes something when the male principle fills it with meaning.
  • My symbolic value is primarily that of a myth of patience and receptivity, a dumb mouth from which the teeth have been pulled.
  • I am indeed allowed to speak but only of things that male society does not take seriously. I can’t hint at dreams, I can even personify the imagination; but that is only because I am not rational enough to cope with reality.
  • (Women) are simply flattering themselves into submission (a technique often used on them by men).
  • Myth deals in false universals, to dull the pain of particular circumstances.
  • (The figures) are a “savage denial of the complexity of human relations is also a consolatory nonsense”.
  • “Any glimpse of a real man or a real woman is absent from these representations of the archetypal male and female”. (they are) “ a fantasy relation to reality”.
  • “These archetypes serve only to confuse the main issue, that relationships between the sexes are determined byy history and the historical fact of the economic independence of women upon men”.
  • “the economic dependence of women remains a believed fiction and is assumed to imply an emotional dependence that is taken for granted as a condition inherent in the natural order of things and so used to console working women for their low wages”.
  • (a woman) “is most immediately and dramatically a woman when she lies beneath a man , and her submission is the apex of his malehood”.
  • “all tributes to the freedom and strength of the roving , fecundating , irresistible male principle and the heavy, downward equally irresistible gravity of the receptive soil”
  • “our flesh arrives to us out of history , like everything else does”
  • “Flesh is not an irreducible human universal”.
  • “the erotic relationship may seem to exist freely , on its own terms , among the distorted social relationships of a bourgeois society , it is , in fact , the most self-consciousness of all human relationships , a direct confrontation of two beings whose actions in the bed are wholly determined by their acts when they are out of it”
  • “The marriage bed is a particularly delusive refuge from the world because all wives of necessity fuck by contrast. Prostitutes are at least decently paid or the nail and boast fewer illusions about a hireling status that has no veneer of social acceptability, but their services are suffering a decline in demand now that other women have invaded their territory in their own search for a newly acknowledged sexual pleasure.
  • “considerations of social class censored the possibility of sexual attraction between the Countess and Figaro before it could have begun to exist”
  • “class dictates our choice of partners and our choice of positions”
  • “control of fertility is a by-product of sexual education and of official legislation concerning the availability of cheap or free conception”
  • “social administrators have decided that poverty is synonymous with stupidity and a poor woman cannot know her own mind”.
  • “lack of privacy limits sexual sophistication”
  • “it is a wonder anyone in this culture ever learns to fuck at all”
  • “Flesh comes to us out of history; so does the repression and taboo that governs our experience of flesh”
  • “Our knowledge is determined by the social boundaries upon it”
  • “Through the archaic sequence of human life – we are born m we fuck, we reproduce, we die – might seem to be universal experience, its universality is not its greatest significance. Since human beings have inverted history , we have also invented those aspects of our lives that seem most immutable , or rather , have invented the circumstances that determine their nature”
  • “Birth and death , the only absolute inescapable , are both absolutely determined by the social context in which they occur”
  • “The notion of a universality of human experience is a confidence trick and the nation of a universality of female experience is a clever confidence trick”
  • “Pornography like marriage and the fictions of romantic love, assists the process of false universalizing.

 

Societal Study

Media/News Stories: 1976-1982 Create a short report (400 words) per story

10 December 1976 – Betty Williams and Mairead Corrigan win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Mairead Maguire (born 27 January 1944) co-founded, with Betty Williams and Ciaran McKeown, the Women for Peace, which later became the Community for Peace People, an organisation dedicated to encouraging a peaceful resolution of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Maguire and Williams were awarded the 1976 Nobel Peace Prize.

Maguire became active with the Northern Ireland peace movement after three children of her sister, Anne Maguire, were run over and killed by a car driven by Danny Lennon, a Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) fugitive who had been fatally shot by British troops while trying to make a getaway. Danny Lennon had been released from prison in April 1976 after serving three years for suspected involvement in the PIRA. On 10 August, Lennon and comrade John Chillingworth were transporting an Armalite rifle through Andersonstown, Belfast, when British troops, claiming to have seen a rifle pointed at them, opened fire on the vehicle, instantly killing Lennon and critically wounding Chillingworth. The car Lennon drove went out of control and mounted a pavement on Finaghy Road North, colliding with Anne Maguire and three of her children who were out shopping.  Joanne (8) and Andrew (6 weeks) died at the scene; John Maguire (2) succumbed to his injuries at a hospital the following day.

Betty Williams, a resident of Andersonstown who happened to be driving by, witnessed the tragedy and accused the IRA of firing at the British patrol and provoking the incident. In the days that followed she began gathering signatures for a peace petition from Protestants and Catholics and was able to assemble some 200 women to march for peace in Belfast. The march passed near the home of Mairead Maguire (then Mairead Corrigan) who joined it. She and Williams thus became "the joint leaders of a virtually spontaneous mass movement."

The next march, to the burial sites of the three Maguire children, brought 10,000 Protestant and Catholic women together. The marchers, including Maguire and Williams, were physically attacked by PIRA members. By the end of the month Maguire and Williams had brought 35,000 people onto the streets of Belfast petitioning for peace between the republican and loyalist factions. Initially adopting the name "Women for Peace," the movement changed its name to the gender-neutral "Community of Peace People," or simply "Peace People," when Irish Press correspondent Ciaran McKeown joined. In contrast with the prevailing climate at the time, Maguire was convinced that the most effective way to end the violence was not through violence but through re-education. The organization published a biweekly paper, Peace by Peace, and provided for families of prisoners a bus service to and from Belfast's jails. In 1977, she and Betsy Williams received the 1976 Nobel Peace Prize with Betty Williams in 1977.

1982 Varying Events:

25 February - The European Court of Justice rules that schools in Britain cannot allow corporal punishment against the wishes of parents.

26 March - The first test tube twins are born in Cambridge.

2 April - Falklands War begins as Argentina invades the Falkland Islands.

7 September - Margaret Thatcher expresses her concern at the growing number of children living in single parent families, but says that she is not opposed to divorce.

8 October - With the economy now climbing out of recession after more than two years, Margaret Thatcher vows to stick to her economic policies, and blames previous governments for the decline that she inherited when taking power more than three years ago.

30 November - A letter bomb sent by Animal rights activists explodes in 10 Downing Street, with packages sent to the leaders of the other political parties. One member of Downing Street staff is burnt.



Polemical Attempts

Posistive/Negative Reviews

  1. Helen Simpson – The Guardian 2006

she had conjured up an exotic new hybrid that would carry her voice to a wider audience than it had reached before.

Her work caused shock waves when it appeared, and it continues to shock.

whether she minded or not, by using the time sanctioned form of fairy tales she acquired readers who would not otherwise have read her. And she was using the forms of fantasy and fairy tales with conscious radical intent

There is an astonishing extra vivid materiality to this alternative world she invented, down to the last sensuous detail

Dialogue came less naturally to her and she avoided it for years, joking that the advantage of including animal protagonists in her work was that she did not have to make them talk. Naturalism or realism, the low mimetic as she called it, was not her mode. Not that she wasn't observant - nothing could have been sharper than her journalism with its gimlet anthropological eye - but in the end her genius did not actually lend itself to the "low mimetic"

Carter was an abstract thinker with an intensely visual imagination

  1. Marina Warner on why Angela Carter’s The Bloody Chamber still bites (Excerpt) The Scotsman 2012

Fairy tales were reviled in the first stirrings of post-war feminist liberation movements as part and parcel of the propaganda that kept women down.

In the context, Angela Carter made an inspired, marvelous move, for which so many other writers as well as readers will always be indebted to her: she refused to join in rejecting or denouncing fairy tales, but instead embraced the whole stigmatised genre, its stock characters and well-known plots, and with wonderful verve and invention, perverse grace and wicked fun, soaked them in a new fiery liquor that brought them leaping back to life.

The Bloody Chamber, which has now become a classic of English literature, far beyond the moment and historical circumstances of its origins.

Yet these stories provided a powerful catalyst. Irreverence and anarchy, skepticism and non-conformity were qualities Carter shared with fellow Londoners in the reverberating force field around the Beatles, the Stones, satirists like Lenny Bruce and the founders of Oz magazine. Curiosity about possible sexualities was a central theme, reflected in the cult status of Jean-Luc Godard’s films of that time.

Carter’s fairy-tale heroines reclaim the night. She rewrites the conventional script formed over centuries of acclimatising girls – and their lovers – to a status quo of captivity and repression, and issues a manifesto for alternative ways of loving, thinking and feeling.

Yet the same readers who are shocked by her acclaim of Sade’s “moral pornography” are enthralled by the way her stories explore similar themes, for The Bloody Chamber also quests for emancipatory erotic’s, beyond subjugation, beyond prejudice.

 The collection’s ten stories, none of them very long, and some of them micro-fictions, haiku-like in their compression, were assembled from disparate writings, and the perfection of the sequence as they follow one from the other happened by chance, chance created by the logic of Angela Carter’s quest for a new, contemporary romance literature fired by erotic imagination.

Her highly wrought prose, especially in these fairy tales, gorgeously elaborates on states of desire and discovery, but it skirts the perils of overblown romance through its poise, always on the edge of a delicious humour.

The scale of her extraordinary achievement has been recognized by the thousands of readers who find in her writing something they know inside themselves but have never encountered expressed in that way before. Often these readers are counterparts of the writer herself at the age she was when she was writing these stories – my students, for example, have to be restricted to writing one essay on her a year, otherwise they would spend their entire English literature degree working on early Carter. For a while after her death, she became the subject of more PhD theses than any other English author.

But not all of her readers are young women – her work bridges frontiers, gender and, above all, eras. She seemed to be writing for her generation out of concerns that dominated children brought up in post-war Britain, but her influence has grown, and grown stronger year on year, with a wide-ranging following among singers, artists, film-makers, dramatists, producers, graphic novelists, all drawing inspiration from her work, especially the fairy tales. She would be astonished at her success and her fame now, since such acclaim eluded her during her lifetime (scandalously, no Booker Prize nomination, for example).

The Bloody Chamber resuscitated fairy tales for today and picked up a dropped thread of English literature of enchantment, as visible in the work of Salman Rushdie and Jeanette Winterson (both openly pay homage to Carter) and, since then, in the creations of myriad others in every medium – Carteresque fabulism has become part of the artistic and literary weather. Recognition from readers at this pitch of intensity has the quality of one of the many enchanted mirrors that appear in Angela Carter’s stories.

Contemporary News Story Feminism: Jennifer Lawrence/Emma Watson

Emma Watson? Jennifer Lawrence? These aren't the feminists you're looking for. There’s nothing wrong with famous women (or men) claiming the cause. But the fame-inist brand ambassadors are a gateway to feminism, not the movement itself. But it irks me that we more easily embrace feminism and feminist messages when delivered in the right package – one that generally includes youth, a particular kind of beauty, fame and/or self-deprecating humour. It frustrates me that the very idea of women enjoying the same inalienable rights as men is so unappealing that we require – even demand – that the person asking for these rights must embody the standards we’re supposedly trying to challenge. That we require brand ambassadors and celebrity endorsements to make the world a more equitable place is infuriating. Celebrities, of course, are often used as part of all vague “rebranding feminist” efforts, and in the last year or so, many famous young women – Jennifer Lawrence, Lena Dunham, Miley Cyrus – have openly claimed feminism. This shouldn’t be news, but it is, because all too often famous women – Katy Perry, Shailene Woodley, Kelly Clarkson – denounce feminism because they believe in humanism or they love men or other such reasons that make little sense.

This is the real problem feminism faces. Too many people are willfully ignorant about what the word means and what the movement aims to achieve. But when a pretty young woman has something to say about feminism (Emma Watson UN speech or Ellen Page Time to Thrive ), all of a sudden, that broad ignorance disappears or is set aside because, at last, we have a more tolerable voice proclaiming the very messages feminism has been trying to impart for so damn long.

Thicke fell flat on his face

Those familiar with Thicke's previously questionable artistic decisions — singing about the "blurred lines" of consent being his most infamous — may not have been surprised when his new album was released and was creepy as hell. More surprising, however, was that people weren't buying it. Literally. To be perfectly fair to Thicke, Paula, named for his now ex-wife, did sell like 530 copies in its first week. But the moral of the story seems to be that the era of the open misogynist may be coming to an end in the music industry.

New Barbie

Did you know that if Barbie were a real woman she would be 5 feet, 9 inches with a 39-inch bust, but only a 18-inch waist, a tiny shoe size of 3 and have to crawl on all fours because her body is so small it couldn't support her head? While there have been many attempts at a Barbie alternative, perhaps the most realistic was created this year by Nickolay Lamm, whose "average" Barbie even comes with imperfections like acne and cellulite.

Aziz Ansari broke down feminism for dudes.

During his appearance on the Late Show with David Letterman in October, Ansari made crucial points about feminism to an otherwise pretty mainstream late night audience: "If you look up feminism in the dictionary, it just means that men and women have equal rights. And I feel like everyone here believes men and women have equal rights. But I think the reason people don't clap is that word is so weirdly used in our culture."

Ansari's message was clear — feminism is not about pitting men and women against each other. "If you believe that men and women have equal rights, if someone asks if you're feminist, you have to say yes because that is how words work," he said.

 



[1] http://www.citelighter.com/political-science/womens-studies/knowledgecards/1st-wave-feminism
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-wave_feminism
[3] http://www.pacificu.edu/about-us/news-events/three-waves-feminism
[4] http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism#History
[6] http://reality.gn.apc.org/polemic/21stCenturyMarxism.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment